Template Tools
Dado's $22M, Alcatel's $15M buy Ikanos time to finish chips

Provides time for node scale vectoring, G.fast. I'm very glad I don't have to write an obituary for Ikanos, home of a large team of respected engineers. $22M from Dado Banatao's Tallwood will keep Ikanos afloat, but it's the $15M Alcatel is putting in that points to a bright future.

    Alcatel remains the largest DSL vendor and has long bought from Ikanos, but many of their DSL chips have been coming from Broadcom. With 40M lines of vectored DSL on order in Europe and Australia, Alcatel wanted to make sure they had several suppliers. Ikanos has been developing a vectoring chip aimed at AT&T and other telcos that want to vector 192 ports in large cabinets. 

    Last year, I killed a story about Ikanos although I was confident it was accurate. Unfortunately, the chips they needed were taking longer than hoped. I listened to the CEO on the conference call and ran the numbers. I was convinced they were soon about to run out of money. There was a registration for a new financing but it wasn't clear whether anyone would put the money up. 

    I don't overestimate my influence but realized that if I published the article it might be the final straw for the company. I decided I didn't want to be responsible for putting 100 hardworking people out of work in a company that had earned my respect. This is not standard journalism practice but as owner I make my own choices.

Canada DSL Takes 2% from cable: U.S. 2% the other way

With most of Bell & Telus upgraded, Canadian cable broadband homes almost go negative. Glen Campbell of Merrill Lynch pointed me to CRTC data http://bit.ly/1voSz5q that showed the Canadian telcos beating the cablecos, who lost 1.3% of the market in 2013.  In the U.S., the results were the opposite, with cable picking up a point or two of market share. Telcos are beating cable in Canada, Britain and France. Cable is beating telcos in Germany and the U.S..

    The largest single factor is the % of homes upgraded by the telco. A strong majority have been upgraded in Britain and Canada, but fewer in the U.S. In Germany, cable is competing by offering twice the speed at the same price, easy because DT is only now getting serious about upgrading. Mike Fries and Liberty Global/Unitymedia KabelBW prefer to raise prices than to increase market share, so we'll see how that plays out.

    The U.S. telco figures are skewed by the AT&T/Verizon decision to kill all landlines to the majority of their territory, going wireless only to 20-30% of homes. They are treating those homes like the Romans treated the Sabine women so of course many are fleeing to cable. Where they have FiOS and U-Verse, they are doing fine, but in the other territories AT&T is doing so poorly they lost a net 50,000 lines in Q2.  

Aintnecessarilyso: Faster broadband yields big income increases.


Author Erik Bohlin says his work "was very preliminary, needed to be replicated, and are not ready to use to make a policy discussion." A quick read of the work showed it was extremely limited. So I was surprised to see an OECD paper http://bit.ly/1sBoqRB by a distinguished scholar presents as fact, "increasing broadband speeds from 4 Mbps to 8 Mbps produced an increase in household income of USD 122 per household per month, and increasing from 8 to 24 Mbps produced a significant further increase beyond that figure (Bohlin et al, 2013)." That's definitely unproven. 

   I find it highly unlikely that watching a second stream of Netflix or more rapidly make a Tinder hookup yields such a large economic payoff. Common sense would require being very skeptical about such a claim and looking closely at the data before using it. Serious scholarship has questioned whether there really is an economic payoff from broadband; in several cases, if there was a net economic payoff it was too small to measure.

     I blame myself for the OECD sloppiness because I knew the Ericsson/Bohlin work had severe limits and never got around to writing an article. The original work was funded by Ericsson, maker of broadband equipment, another red flag. I am carefully not claiming Bohlin distorted his findings in return for Ericsson's money. In a follow-up with me, Bohlin and co-author Ibrahim Kholilul Rohman have been sensible about the limits of their work.

10 gigabits + using higher frequencies

RTed and Robert's new bookJapan, Korea plan 28 GHz 5G for 2018-2020. If 3 gigabits isn't enough, in a few years you'll be able to go to "millimeter wave," 15 GHz, 28 GHz, 60 GHz WiGIG or similar. There are literally gigahertz of spectrum available, enough for 10 gigabit and higher speed service. At the Brooklyn 5G Wireless Summit, I spoke with AT&T President John Stankey and NTT DOCOMO Seizo Onoe.

    Onoe is ready go as soon as the equipment is ready, with Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson, Fujitsu, NEC, Nokia and Samsung supporting his trials per the release below.  Stankey is more cautious, still studying, but he wouldn't have come to Brooklyn if AT&T wasn't serious. Lots of problems still to solve, including short reach and difficult reflections, but there are hundreds of engineers at major companies already at work. 

   The "Prince of 28 GHz," Ted Rappaport of NYU Wireless, led that conference and has a new book out, Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications. It's certain to become the primary reference because of the prominence of the authors. His co-author Robert Heath has built an MU-MIMO testbed at the University of Texas that's a crucial proof of concept for MU-MIMO. It's professionally priced ($100-125) but through Thursday 9/25 you can get a 40% discount with the code MMWAVE40 at http://bit.ly/1Dmi5fk

3.8 Gigabit LTE. 3.8 Gigabit? Just a demo, but definitely feasible

Nokia demoMasayoshi Son at Sprint or Korea Telecom in Rwanda could deliver a gigabit in a few years. Nokia used 200 MHz, about 5 times the spectrum advanced carriers are using today, and achieved about 15 times the performance of today's better networks. Nokia has just demonstrated 3.8 gigabits, as you can see in this video. http://bit.ly/Nokia38

    A team at Rice & Cornell Universities have designed a chip they believe will support a similar 3.8 gigabits in only 100 MHz, the amount of spectrum available to Sprint as well as most of Latin America and Africa.  (Note below) Henry Samueli of Broadcom in a Marconi webinar predicted chips like that. Since 2011 and 3GPP release 10, every informed wireless engineer has known speeds will pass a gigabit (shared) on many commercial networks.

   That kind of performance is just what we'd expect as MU MIMO and massive MIMO come out of the labs. Some excellent engineers on Oct 2 in D.C. will be discussing MIMO 2025:  A 10x or 100x Capacity Multiplier? at the Marconi Symposium.  Stanford Professors Paulraj (inventor of MIMO) & Cioffi, Robert Lucky and Thomas Marzetta of Bell Labs, as well as Helmut Bölcskei of ETH Zurich are on the panel. http://bit.ly/MarconiDC  If you're in D.C. do attend; elsewhere, the webcast will be at http://marconisociety.org/blog/index.php/symposium-live-stream

   Re-farming alone should yield about 100 MHz in most countries, even without adding more monopoly spectrum. Good engineers debate whether the performance increase will be 25X, 50X or 100X today's average network, as long as the regulators are neither stupid nor corrupt.  

Soon come: 145 MHz spectrum, 3 gigabit speeds in Rwanda

Rwandan ORN workersKorea Telecom/Rwanda Government ORN spectrum could support ~2 gigabits across the country. While the initial rollout is using only 20 MHz, the Nokia equipment being installed can expand quickly to 60 MHz/400 megabits. There's a clear roadmap at least to 100 MHz with higher MIMO, enough to go well above a gigabit.  Nokia demonstrated 3.8 gigabits at the recent Mobile Asia event, using 200 MHz. http://bit.ly/38gigabits

   Joint venture ORN has 145 MHz of prime low band spectrum between 700 MHz and 900 MHz. This is one of the world's first wide allocations of spectrum, the most efficient way to increase capacity in the LTE and 5G era. Large spectrum blocks are the right move for capacity in any country with few wires, including India, Indonesia, and almost all of sub-Saharan Africa. 

AT&T & Verizon: We have enough capacity so spectrum isn't a big issue

Ralph de la Vega & Lowell McAdam are pros. More spectrum makes adding capacity cheaper but any wireless engineer can tell you the "spectrum crisis" is political bunkum. This week at Goldman Sachs, CEO McAdam of Verizon and President de la Vega of AT&T made clear they can move forward whether or not they get more spectrum. That confirms what the previous Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg and AT&T's John Stankey had said in 2009. Both were comfident they'd do just fine. Five years later, their average customer speed on LTE is about 15 megabits, ten times as high as 2009. 

    Ralph, one of the most respected executives in the business, told investors "We feel really good about where we are. ... we don't have this burning desire for the need of coverage or for other reasons to go aggressively after Wi-Fi. Other operators that may have less coverage or have other needs, may pursue it more aggressively." Both Verizon and AT&T have boxed in the unused capacity of their customers DSL & fiber connections. Turning it on would add ?30%-50% more capacity in territory.

    Lowell, a trained engineer, "We have a lot of AWS spectrum, We have great capacity in place. We’re densifying the network with either small cells or LTE unlicensed. So the network has the capacity.  ... We have the assets in place. I don’t think we need a heckuva lot more. ... It goes a long way beyond just getting the spectrum. ... Always looking for efficiency. The small cell technology being deployed gives us a lot more capacity. ... WiFi is a critical part of the ecosystem managing the network. Using unlicensed spectrum is going to be important for us as we go forward. We intend to deploy LTE-U with the small cell technology, integrate it within the wider macro network, There are many dynamics that are involved in being more efficient. ,,, Even working with content providers to make sure you have the right formats to put less load on the networks."

    "We expect to see capex as a % of revenue to fall. I hope it continues at least at the absolute level," confirms that Verizon is not squeezed.

Stankey of AT&T: 5x5 spectrum blocks just aren't right

Rwandan coffee picker from Borlaug InstituteYet another conflict between efficiency and competition. At the coming U.S. AWS-3 auction, several of the lots are 5 MHz down and 5 MHz up, in order to let smaller companies bid. Small spectrum allocations are highly inefficient, cost more to build, waste some spectrum to avoid interference and possibly require special handsets to "aggregate" different bands.  The LTE-A that's deploying today is most efficient with 50-100 MHz of contiguous spectrum, not 5 MHz or 10 MHz. Older versions of LTE were designed around 10x10 bands. Competition is great when it works but the "cost of competition" is often very high. It's much cheaper to build one network instead of four or even two. lines.

DSL Tsunami over Europe: 40M Promised Vectored Lines


Europe going DSL, not fiber, except Spain, Scandinavia and perhaps France. When Deutsche Telekom in September 2012 decided to abandon fiber and go with vectored DSL, it inspired the DSL tsunami. Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium and the Netherlands are now delivering 50-100 megabit speeds to tens of thousands of paying customers. Alcatel, Huawei, Keymile and Adtran have shipped at least 5,000,000 ports capable of vectoring, although the telcos aren't offering the service to most of those homes. 

   Almost no one believed John & George back in 2003 when they predicted 100 megabit DSL to 500 meters and more. By 2010, vendors including Alcatel, Huawei and ECI had lab test; by 2011, Austria and Belgium telcos had some results from the field. By September 2012, the trend was clear, as you can see from the excerpt below of my DSL Tsunami article. 

     Deutsche Telekom promised their regulator they'd be vectoring by the end of 2013. They are almost a year late and still moving slowly, with only 200K homes eligible. They target 3.5M by the ebd of 2014 and 20M more in 2015 & 2016. Anyone want to bet on this?

Half Million broadband adds China Telecom’s worst month since 2007

4G launch nibbling at DSL. 550.000 adds in June is more than the U.S. adds in four months but is down about a quarter from last year. Other recent CT months are also down compared to prior years. Rival China Unicom added 378K for the month, but that’s also down a quarter from last year, same month. Update: July figures are in. Drops further to 530,000 August fell to 490,000.

    Telecom is at 104M, Unicom at 68M, both far ahead of any other carrier in the world. They’ve been the industry driver for years, so any slowdown will soon be reflected in equipment sales. Wireline broadband at China Tel brought in 55B ¥ ($9B), more than the combined total of wireline and wireless voice (48B¥.)

     The build in China is amazing compared to anywhere else.  CT added 15M homes passed with fiber last year, almost as much as the total of the largest build in the West. At current rates, CT will have passed 100M homes with fiber this fall. 33M have already subscribed, many switching from DSL.

4 U.S. Companies: 70% of the Net, 78% of Pay TV

Wall Street Journal Stats

Shalini Ramachandran dramatically shows how concentrated the U.S. is getting. This chart from the Wall Street Journal shows how little competition we have in the United States. When Tom Wheeler lets through the giant Comcast-Time Warner merger, Brian Roberts will control 36% of the U.S. broadband market. Add AT&T, Verizon & Cox and 4 companies control 70% of the U.S. fast Internet. Not long ago, we had 7 Baby Bells, GTE and a dozen fairly large MSO's. The industry has about half as many companies today. 

     Columbia's Eli Noam, the world's leading public intellectual in communications, calculates that concentration in U.S. broadband went up 60% from 2002 to 2013. The prices in the U.S. are "higher than in many other countries." Lack of competition holds back innovation, which Noam believes essential for the U.S. to compete when so many countries have lower wages. The high prices result in high profits that may increase investment, Eli added. Christopher Yoo has done some work that suggests there is an effect, although personally I find competition and improved technology a far more important factor. Eli's book, Media Ownership and Concentration in America, is the standard reference. The follow-up, Who Owns the World's Media?: Media Concentration and Ownership around the World  http://bit.ly/noammedia is a thousand page opus with many international co-authors, soon to be published.

Comcast, Verizon & AT&T proved how effective that market power can be by forcing Netflix to pay them to send video to their customers. Sender pays is a mistake. There's no way to reach 21 million homes without going through Comcast. That's called a "terminating monopoly." Broadband customers typically won't change ISPs for 5 years or more so Comcast's control will continue. A video company can't make it if blocked from a quarter of the customers in the U.S., especially if the other ISPs do the same. 

    At 36% of the U.S., Comcast will be large enough to destroy almost any independent video company. They haven't used that power maliciously but the profits from aggressive charging will be hard to resist. With no choice, video providers will have to pay even exorbitant rates. Some of that inevitably will be passed on to consumers.  

On privacy, "conflicting feelings" of the Internet governors

Apple, Google & Cisco "support" privacy but Internet leaders are conflicted. "FBI Director James B. Comey sharply criticized Apple and Google on Thursday for developing forms of smartphone encryption," the Washington Post reports http://wapo.st/1qHVVtQ. I believe the FBI is fighting against a rough consensus among the IETF and Internet technical community that privacy should be protected by technical means. That includes encryption that neither the government nor the cell phone designer can crack.

    Bob Hinden, Chair of the Internet Society and a long time leader at IETF etc. sent Dave Farber's IP list an interesting note. I'm picking it up because I've heard similar from others, not to single out Hinden. 


I admit to have conflicting feelings on this.  Part of me is happy that no one has access to the keys, but at the same I time I have some sympathy for legitimate law enforcement.  There are bad guys out there.  If I had to choose, I would pick civil liberties over law enforcement access.  With what we have learned about what the NSA is doing, I think it's time for the pendulum to swing back more towards the middle.  NSA (with the apparent support of Congress and the Administration) clearly has abused their capability to get the keys.

Bob" (I added the emphasis)

    I'm glad Bob chose to support civil liberties. Many others make different choices. Cisco, for example, is not merely very close to U.S. security agencies but played a crucial role building the Great Firewall of China. I was glad to hear Cisco support encryption recently but remain skeptical. It's almost a joke the U.S. reps on Internet security bodies including the ITU come from Cisco.

BT Faking it on G.fast

200-600 meg pretty fast so why hype? British Telecom, despite the BBC and other news reports, did not attain a gigabit with G.fast. They merely showed that 104 MHz over a protected standard copper line could reach speeds of 786 megabits down 19 meters, something obvious for years from the basic engineering. The substance of G.fast is significant so the hype is unneeded.

BT's results were not for G.fast. G.fast is a 300 page specification that BT/Huawei didn't even pretend to support. Many features, such as reverse power, are important and were not implemented. Vectoring in G.fast remains totally unproven and will be crucial to any deployment. Several features of G.fast are likely to reduce the speed. The effect may be relatively modest but we won't know until they are tested.

NY Times doesn't get that MIMO increases spectrum capacity 300% and more

Lowell McAdam knows spectrum Five years of WiFi prove multiple antennas dramatically improve throughput. A key reason D.C. policy is awful is that many in D.C. don't realize the extraordinary increase already happening in spectrum capacity. The engineers are instead debating whether the MIMO increase will be 10x or 100x, with the higher estimates getting strong support. http://bit.ly/MSDCREG

    Four years ago, most U.S. cell phones ran at 1-3 megabits. The latest measurements have AT&T at 14 megabits, Verizon at 16 and T-Mobile at 19! Even a reporter can see the networks are more than keeping up and the lobbyist spin is highly implausible. But Wyatt reports "mobile broadband depends on the public airwaves known as spectrum, which is a finite commodity with limited capacity," based on a comment from Meredith Baker, D.C. lawyer/lobbyist.  The actual problem for the telcos is finding enough customers, not finding spectrum.

    That's just the start; Spain, Singapore, Korea & the Emirates are deploying 300 megabit shared LTE, which is twice as fast as the U.S. offerings. Nokia is demonstrating 10x that speed, 3.8 Gigabit LTE. 3.8 Gigabit? Just A Demo, But Definitely Feasible http://bit.ly/38gigabits If you want 10 gigabits, Ted Rappaport just wrote a book explaining how that will be delivered with millimeter waves, perhaps 28 GHz. http://bit.ly/Millimeterbook

    Instead of believing Baker, a lobbyist, Wyatt should read what Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam & AT&T President Ralph de la Vega are telling investors. AT&T & Verizon: We Have Enough Capacity So Spectrum Isn't A Big Issue http://bit.ly/Bellsspectrum Lowell, an experienced engineer, notes "We have a lot of AWS spectrum, We have great capacity in place. ... the network has the capacity." In fact, Lowell has been cutting capex while speeding up the network. "We expect to see capex as a % of revenue to fall."

To Tap a DSL line, use Tracespan

Tracespan interceptWikileaks isn't all secret. Tracespan makes some of the best DSL test gear, so I shouldn't have been surprised to see them on a list of tappers at Wikileaks. Wikileaks' SpyFiles is making news with details of high-powered hacking tools shipped from the West to governments which abuse dissenters such as Egypt, Qatar & UAE. They identified $65M in FinFisher "weaponed malware;" there's plenty of money being made here. Alcatel, Siemens and the other western communications vendors were heavily represented, some leaked.

   I also found in the Wikileaks files the Israeli company Tracespan. The Wikileaks data on Tracespan was interesting but not secret. I found some of the files at http://www.tracespan.com/ipVDSLPhantom.aspx under "lawful intercept." I'm sure Tracespan cooperates with Israeli intelligence, which like the U.S. CIA or French sécurité extérieure is a "by any means necessary" outfit. (Think Iran-contra.) 

   The U.S./Australia Huawei ban may inspired more by the difficulty for U.S. spies than the danger from Chinese ones. 

Doug Sicker moves from Colorado to Carnegie-Mellon

Doug SickerBoulder Colorado remains a top telecom hub. About a dozen engineers/academics play an outsized role in D.C. policy, having earned friendship and respect from the top policymakers. Sicker was the Chief Technologist of both the FCC & NTIA  and is always heard when he goes to D.C. (Doug's picture is from long ago.)

   Carnegie is one of the world's best computer science departments but I was surprised be moved to Pittsburgh. He loves Colorado.  I asked Doug why he moved and his reply is below.  

   The University of Colorado at Boulder is among the very strongest centers for telecom work, with Phil Weiser (close to Obama) and Dale Hatfield (D.C.'s longtime favorite engineer.) David Reed has recently come over from CableLabs to run the Interdisciplinary Telecom Program.

For the record: Dave to FCC on what to do when competition doesn't work

Will Wheeler do anything to reverse the high U.S. prices? That would be the logical followup to his speech asserting  “meaningful competition for high-speed wired broadband is lacking and that Americans need more competitive choices for faster and better Internet connections.” http://bit.ly/FCCBlog I'm skeptical and commented on the FCC blog:

Wheeler is going in the right direction but both of you are ducking a crucial question: What's the right policy when competition is weak and there's no practical way to "incent competition." When I go to Wall Street, nearly no one seems willing to invest the $billions if would take to broadly take on the incumbents, no matter what "incentives" you find. Competition is great but when it's not working we need to be realistic. 

   Over the last 7 years, U.S. prices for high-speed broadband have risen to typically 30%-70% higher than Germany, France & England. 

   Time to do more than talk and pray. 


$2,000,000,000.000 of CEOs Coming to Goldman Sachs: The right questions

Claure, the football club ownerMcAdam of Verizon, de la Vega of AT&T, Gavin Patterson of BT & dozens more. The most powerful executives in the world are coming to NY for the Goldman Sachs 23rd Annual Communacopia Conference. Brett Feldman is Goldman's new telecom analyst. Brett comes from Deutsche Bank; I've been reading his thoughtful work for several years. He just started Verizon at Buy because he believes their high value customers will stick by them despite others dropping prices.

    Smart executives don't lie to Wall Street, even if they are untruthful to reporters and regulators. Analysts who think you're not truthful can really hurt the stock price. Goldman is always a good show because they skip the boring speeches and go right to the key questions. Most will be webcast and Seeking Alpha should have transcripts quickly. 

Do click through for more:

(Retracted) U.S. Wireless Deep Decline After Mergers - Deloitte

Deloitte wireless indexGoing from 6 carriers to 4 apparently a huge mistake.  The Deloitte Mobile Communications National Achievement Index, a mix of 15 indicators, plummeted from 2006 to 2009 a dramatic 25-30%, after the Sprint/Nextel and Cingular/AT&T Wireless mergers http://bit.ly/Deldrop. Pretty dramatic, as you can see in the chart.  

Update Sept 13: I made a bad mistake assuming that Deloitte, one of the world's largest accounting firms, wasn't fudging the data. But I can't think of any other reason Deloitte refuses to answer my questions about the index itself or to supply the data for countries comparable to the U.S. such as Britain or Germany. This is extremely poor behavior that devalues their work. No one wanting to be taken seriously in a policy discussion would make important claims without providing a way to confirm their data.

   If they actually believe we face "a direct loss of USD 67 billion in GDP and 344,000 jobs in less than a decade. Furthermore, an unavailability of spectrum puts at risk the heavily mobile-dependent Internet of Things, and with it a potential USD 1.2 trillion of new economic growth," I don't see how anyone who knows the industry would consider hiring them as consultants. Craig Wigginton is the Telecom lead at Deloitte; Phil Wilson, Dwight Allen and Kevin Thompson are the listed authors. It's possible that Deloitte chose to deliberately put out something misleading to support the lobbying efforts of some big clients.   

End update. 

    Ad hoc ergo propter hoc, of course, but no other explanation I can imagine would explain such a severe drop.  

    The latest index is still substantially below 2006 despite a modest recovery starting 2009. Verizon's LTE build started in 2009, now followed by AT&T, but that wasn't enough to make up the ground. Note that the index went down in boom times but rose during the Great Recession. 

LTE 300 Megabits? Singapore, Spain On

Realworld likely speeds of 50-150 megabits 90+% of the time. Two 20 MHz bands will deliver speeds like this. You rarely will need that kind of speed but higher capacity wireless means more bandwidth for all. The 2 gigabyte and 5 gigabyte caps need to disappear and they will where there's enough competition. 55% of Singapore is covered now and they'll be close to 100% next year.

Update 3 September: Vodafone in Spain announced a similar 300 megabit (shared) deployment rapidly going countrywide. By December, Voda will have 4G to 100% of Spanish towns of 25,000 or higher. 

   Rwanda will soon be supporting 750 megabits, as they build a network that can aggregate 5 carriers. The Africans look to leapfrog the west as they have plenty of spectrum available. There are very, very few phone wires in sub-Saharan Africa so the service will be wireless and they intend to make it efficient. 

~50 MHz Enough for a Verizon-sized Network. Really.

How many mobile networks can be supported in a given amount of bandwidth? Verizon is currently the best LTE network in the U.S., a good starting point. LTE is remarkably efficient, even without MIMO and better antennas. Based on Verizon data and eight grade math, I calculated all the traffic on Verizon's network could be easily handled in 50 MHz, about half of what they own. People were startled, but the number makes sense.

    Verizon's CFO, Fran Shammo told Wall Street 64% of all their traffic was being carried in 20 MHz with LTE. http://bit.ly/1pmLdyh If 64% fits in 20 MHz, than 100% of the traffic would require 31 MHz. My figure of about 50 MHz is well above that. 

    If spectrum owners like Dish or Lightsquared were to build a new network, 40-50 MHz would give them a very robust service. In effect, that's what Sprint is doing,  using other spectrum to maintain services to earlier customers not on LTE.

     It wouldn't be trivial to squeeze today's Verizon down to 50 MHz. Voice on Verizon's network currently goes over an inefficient 2G network; it would need to be moved to VoLTE, a process just beginning. VoLTE provides higher quality voice using much less bandwidth. Glen Campbell of Merrill pointed to that bandwidth savings as part of his 2009 analysis that the spectrum crisis was bogus. I asked one of the world's most respected engineers about Verizon's claim ""Verizon needs more spectrum and will need more than that in the future." He replied "c__p," although he was more polite when the recording was turned on. To get down to 50 MHz, Verizon would also need to move the 3G customers quickly to LTE. That might require subsidizing new phones, a large cost but not impossible. 

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 3